Return-Path: X-Original-To: jtadeusz@april.org Delivered-To: jtadeusz@april.org Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.1.16]) by pavot.april.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2824218C01D3; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:11:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pavot.april.org ([192.168.1.17]) by localhost (spamvir.april.org [192.168.1.16]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wxRjuaIXkFKo; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:11:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pavot.april.org (Postfix, from userid 102) id B7D5D18C01D6; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:11:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.1.16]) by pavot.april.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888FE1530049 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:10:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pavot.april.org ([192.168.1.17]) by localhost (spamvir.april.org [192.168.1.16]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JmusW9ARnefW for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:10:24 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: Softfail (domain owner discourages use of this host) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=212.27.42.1; helo=smtp1-g21.free.fr; envelope-from=ycombe@april.org; receiver=educ@april.org Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.1]) by pavot.april.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815CE18C0605 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:10:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2a01:e34:eea3:c180:beae:c5ff:fee4:ee9d] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e34:eea3:c180:beae:c5ff:fee4:ee9d]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A923E94042E; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:10:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E9BD4D9.7070901@april.org> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:10:17 +0200 From: Yves Combe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110820 Icedove/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bdesroches@free.fr, educ@april.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [EDUC] =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_=5BEduc=5D_=C3=89lections_professionnelles?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C3=89ducation_Nationale?= X-Loop: educ@april.org X-Sequence: 3835 Errors-to: educ-owner@april.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: educ-request@april.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Le 17/10/2011 08:55, bdesroches@free.fr a écrit : > Certes mais quelle serait la forme d'un "échec massif" ? Car un taux de participation faible sera toujours commenté de diverses manières et ne constituera pas, de fait, un échec massif... Un taux de participation divisé par 10. Il ne faut pas seulement qu'il soit faible, il faut qu'il soit beaucoup plus faible que les élections précédentes. Si cela arrivait avec une consigne syndicale de boycott, on pourrait se retrancher derrière la responsabilité syndicale. Mais un taux très faible alors que les syndicats ont joué le jeu… -- yves -- Pour gérer votre abonnement à la liste educ et vos informations personnelles : http://listes.april.org/wws/info/educ