Return-Path: <educ-owner@april.org>
X-Original-To: jtadeusz@april.org
Delivered-To: jtadeusz@april.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.1.16])
	by pavot.april.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F2015300A8;
	Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:41:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pavot.april.org ([192.168.1.17])
	by localhost (spamvir.april.org [192.168.1.16]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 3AKTEd90WReP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:41:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by pavot.april.org (Postfix, from userid 102)
	id BB1C614C0076; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:41:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.1.16])
	by pavot.april.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A96C15300A8
	for <educ@april.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:41:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pavot.april.org ([192.168.1.17])
	by localhost (spamvir.april.org [192.168.1.16]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id Tffh70jvIpvp for <educ@april.org>;
	Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:41:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (no SPF record) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=212.27.42.5; helo=smtp5-g21.free.fr; envelope-from=cnestel@free.fr; receiver=educ@april.org 
Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (smtp5-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.5])
	by pavot.april.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAD71530040
	for <educ@april.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:41:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zimbra27-e5.priv.proxad.net (unknown [172.20.243.177])
	by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F61D48189;
	Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:41:07 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:41:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: cnestel@free.fr
To: Georges Khaznadar <georges.khaznadar@free.fr>
Cc: educ@april.org
Message-ID: <506674045.8963721319132466354.JavaMail.root@zimbra27-e5.priv.proxad.net>
In-Reply-To: <1804568674.8962391319132147199.JavaMail.root@zimbra27-e5.priv.proxad.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Originating-IP: [82.224.225.22]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/5.0.15_GA_2815.UBUNTU8_64)
X-Authenticated-User: cnestel@free.fr
Subject: Re: [EDUC] =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=A9lections_professionnelles_=3A_un_CP_co?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?mmun_=3F?=
X-Loop: educ@april.org
X-Sequence: 3854
Errors-to: educ-owner@april.org
Precedence: list
Precedence: bulk
Sender: educ-request@april.org
X-no-archive: yes
List-Id: <educ.april.org>
List-Archive: <https://listes.april.org/wws/arc/educ>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa@april.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:educ-request@april.org>
List-Post: <mailto:educ@april.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:sympa@april.org?subject=subscribe%20educ>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sympa@april.org?subject=unsubscribe%20educ>


----- "Georges Khaznadar" <georges.khaznadar@free.fr> a =C3=A9crit :

> Yves Combe a =C3=A9crit :
> > ... la seule solution
> > d=C3=A9mocratique est de mettre fin au vote =C3=A9lectronique.
>=20
> +1

1) pourquoi ne pas le dire dans un CP ?

2) Au cas d'un manque de consensus (le message de Benoit, ex-pr=C3=A9sident
de l'April t=C3=A9moigne qu'au sein m=C3=AAme du CA de l'April rien n'est t=
ranch=C3=A9,
alors que dire des autres associations ?) faudrait-il ne rien faire ?

J'estime qu'il est n=C3=A9anamoins n=C3=A9cessaire de marquer le coup.

Si, apr=C3=A8s des d=C3=A9bats argument=C3=A9s et pertinents, sur les diff=
=C3=A9rentes
listes du libre =C3=A9ducatif, aucun consensus n'est possible, ce serait
un =C3=A9chec.

Librement,
Charlie
--
Pour g=C3=A9rer votre abonnement =C3=A0 la liste educ et vos informations p=
ersonnelles :
http://listes.april.org/wws/info/educ
