Return-Path: <educ-owner@april.org>
X-Original-To: jtadeusz@april.org
Delivered-To: jtadeusz@april.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.2.16])
	by pavot.april.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25AF330C02A6;
	Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:53:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pavot.april.org ([192.168.2.17])
	by localhost (spamvir.april.org [192.168.2.16]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 5DgDUmuMrutU; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:53:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: by pavot.april.org (Postfix, from userid 102)
	id B0D9230C02AB; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:53:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.2.16])
	by pavot.april.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5412418C07BF
	for <educ@april.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:53:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pavot.april.org ([192.168.2.17])
	by localhost (spamvir.april.org [192.168.2.16]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id fs6reoRZgkLt for <educ@april.org>;
	Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:53:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com (mail-we0-f175.google.com [74.125.82.175])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pavot.april.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 690B218C07B7
	for <educ@april.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:53:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id q59so2687631wes.34
        for <educ@april.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 01:53:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=9ma9qDrngmDfWAMI6H971kC6F7qxS38D7165azj+b0U=;
        b=DK7yo4QrXof5f3ODECa2bfZU0ztzDrovmj96RLMSGmSrTfs58ytIk72/HwpZr/963l
         m/PEAvyQs9iWhzrmYLA0YBp+Ab8V0KQuiBO83C4Ez/ew4xZhosbzchaX1fvrs2P4KJCI
         0ozvYxBEE0wcUDmFzn6clKMgh7jBJn/YnJzVZzEunGRI1ED8Q/iPnN0eP3Gnm0IMVERN
         3jZwoOI9uhc6/Ho4tcOqyf/3h1a+xbev12FSWx8oBP5EcmiVfkRZKHOms6hkenKmCOGo
         sxOKUu+JbgjWBvsmCkX2aQ+TbBfeY0cfR5KZK9/jpTHDDzXbvOCUEaG9YKHZBhX2AYDR
         /e2w==
X-Received: by 10.195.13.164 with SMTP id ez4mr6599915wjd.11.1393494808947;
        Thu, 27 Feb 2014 01:53:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (cty37-1-78-214-92-191.fbx.proxad.net. [78.214.92.191])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hy8sm9742975wjb.2.2014.02.27.01.53.27
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Thu, 27 Feb 2014 01:53:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <530F0B15.3060107@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:53:25 +0100
From: Anthony GOUBIN <an.goubin@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Chemouil <david@chemouil.fr>
CC: educ@april.org
References: <530E6333.9020505@remiboulle.fr> <530E7F2E.80004@gmail.com> <530F0221.5060601@chemouil.fr>
In-Reply-To: <530F0221.5060601@chemouil.fr>
Subject: Re: [EDUC] =?UTF-8?Q?Appel_pour_l=27interop=C3=A9rabilit=C3=A9?=
X-Loop: educ@april.org
X-Sequence: 5653
Errors-to: educ-owner@april.org
Precedence: list
Precedence: bulk
Sender: educ-request@april.org
X-no-archive: yes
List-Id: <educ.april.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa@april.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:sympa@april.org?subject=subscribe%20educ>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sympa@april.org?subject=unsubscribe%20educ>
List-Post: <mailto:educ@april.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:educ-request@april.org>
List-Archive: <https://listes.april.org/wws/arc/educ>
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
  boundary="----------=_1393494817-26749-3421"
X-Length: 5138
Status: R
X-Status: NT
X-KMail-EncryptionState:  
X-KMail-SignatureState:  
X-KMail-MDN-Sent:  
X-UID: 0

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1393494817-26749-3421
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

D'accord avec toi, le parallèle entre interopérabilité et langue n'est 
pas sans faille. Mais il y a cette idée que si on veut se comprendre, 
s'échanger de l'information, il faut qu'il y ait une ou des langages (ie 
les formats) compréhensible(s) par tous. Mais en effet, ça n'implique 
pas une langue commune. Je ne vois pas trop ce que ça pourrait donner en 
slogan ... j'y réfléchis.
A.


Le 27/02/2014 10:15, David Chemouil a écrit :
> Le jeu. 27 févr. 2014 00:56:30 CET, Anthony GOUBIN a écrit :
>> Une idée vite fait en passant : "Et si, en informatique, on parlait
>> enfin tous la même langue ?"
>
> Une idée à creuser, je pense, que l'approche par la langue.
> Mais remarquez que l'interopérabilité, c'est précisément tout sauf 
> parler tous la même langue. Ça, c'est nos adversaires justement. 
> L'interopérabilité, ce serait plutôt pouvoir tous se comprendre sans 
> parler la même langue.
>
> david


------------=_1393494817-26749-3421
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; name="message-footer.txt"
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="message-footer.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

--
Pour gérer votre abonnement à la liste educ et vos informations personnelles :
http://listes.april.org/wws/info/educ

------------=_1393494817-26749-3421--